Skip links

Kliniken Day Surgery Centre in Harrogate, North Yorkshire

Instagram Facebook
Kliniken

Lipoma Removal Unveiled: The Good and Bad

Author
Published on:
Published in: Skin

Lipoma Removal Unveiled: The Good and Bad

Introduction

Imagine a world where an unsightly lump beneath your skin, known as a lipoma, casts a shadow on your self-confidence and quality of life. For many individuals, this scenario is not a mere imagining but a daily reality. Lipomas, while typically benign, can be a source of discomfort, physical and emotional distress, and even limited mobility. 

However, the path to relief is not always straightforward. The world of lipoma treatment is diverse, and not all options are created equal. That’s why it’s crucial to navigate this landscape with knowledge and understanding.

In this article, we embark on a journey to unravel the impact of lipomas on your well-being, explore an array of available treatment methods, and provide you with a comprehensive guide to their pros and cons. 

From minimally invasive techniques to surgical procedures, we will break down each option, allowing you to make an informed decision about the most suitable path to renewed confidence and comfort.

Let’s embark on this enlightening exploration of lipoma removal, where knowledge is your greatest ally on the road to a better quality of life.

What is a Lipoma?

The Options for Minimally Invasive Lipoma Removal

  1. Liposuction: Liposuction is one of the most common minimally invasive methods for removing lipomas. It involves making a small incision near the lipoma and inserting a thin tube called a cannula. The cannula is used to suction out the fatty tissue of the lipoma. Liposuction is suitable for small to moderately sized-lipomas.
  2. Endoscopic Removal: In this technique, a small incision is made, and an endoscope (a thin, flexible tube with a camera) is inserted to visualize the lipoma and surrounding tissues. Surgical instruments are then used to remove the lipoma through the same incision. Endoscopic removal provides a clear view of the surgical area and is useful for deeper or larger lipomas.
  3. Minimal Access Excision: This technique involves making a smaller incision than traditional surgery. The surgeon removes the lipoma through this small incision using specialized instruments. This method reduces scarring and promotes quicker healing.
  4. Tumescent Technique: The tumescent technique involves injecting a tumescent solution into the area around the lipoma. This solution contains a local anaesthetic and vasoconstrictors to reduce bleeding. After the solution has taken effect, the lipoma is removed through a small incision. This method helps minimise pain and swelling during and after surgery.
  5. Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA): RFA uses high-frequency electrical currents to heat and destroy the lipoma’s fat cells. A small needle-like probe is inserted into the lipoma through a tiny incision, and the radiofrequency energy is applied. The fat cells are liquefied and then removed or absorbed by the body over time.
  6. Laser Lipolysis: Laser lipolysis involves using laser energy to break down the fat cells in the lipoma. A laser fibre is inserted through a small incision, and the laser energy is delivered to the lipoma, causing it to melt. The liquefied fat is then either suctioned out or left to be absorbed by the body.
  7. Cryolipolysis: Cryolipolysis, also known as “fat freezing,” involves applying cold temperatures to the lipoma to freeze and destroy the fat cells. This is a non-invasive technique that doesn’t require incisions. The body gradually eliminates the damaged fat cells naturally.

The Pros and Cons

Let’s delve deeper to understand the pros and cons of each of the approaches.

Liposuction

Minimally Invasive: Liposuction involves making small incisions, which results in less tissue trauma and smaller scars compared to traditional open surgery.

Quick Recovery: Patients typically experience a faster recovery period after liposuction compared to more invasive surgical procedures, allowing them to return to their regular activities sooner.

Reduced Pain: Liposuction is generally associated with less post-operative pain compared to open surgery.

Improved Cosmetic Outcome: Liposuction can provide a more aesthetically pleasing result, especially for lipomas located in visible or cosmetically sensitive areas of the body.

Lower Risk of Complications: The risk of infection and complications is generally lower with liposuction compared to open surgical methods.

Incomplete Removal: Liposuction may not always completely remove the lipoma, especially if it has a fibrous or dense capsule. In such cases, additional treatments may be needed.

Recurrence: There is a possibility of lipoma recurrence, particularly if not all the lipoma cells are removed during the procedure. Recurrence rates can vary depending on the size and type of lipoma.

Bruising and Swelling: While less severe than in open surgery, liposuction can still cause bruising and swelling at the incision sites. These typically resolve over time.

Infection: While the risk of infection is lower than with open surgery, there is still a minimal risk of infection at the incision sites. It's crucial to follow post-operative care instructions to minimize this risk.

Numbness or Sensation Changes: Some patients may experience temporary numbness or altered sensation around the treated area. This usually resolves as the body heals but can be a concern for some individuals.

Scarring: Although the scars from liposuction are typically smaller and less noticeable than those from open surgery, there is still a risk of scarring.

Skin Irregularities: Liposuction may result in uneven skin texture or contour irregularities in some cases, although these are usually minor and can often be improved with additional treatments or time.

Endoscopic Removal 

Minimal Scarring: Endoscopic removal involves making small incisions through which a thin, flexible tube with a camera (endoscope) is inserted. These smaller incisions result in minimal scarring compared to traditional open surgery.

Precise Visualisation: The endoscope provides a clear, magnified view of the lipoma and surrounding tissues, allowing for precise and controlled removal.

Reduced Tissue Trauma: The minimally invasive nature of the procedure means that there is less disruption to surrounding tissues, resulting in reduced post-operative pain and a shorter recovery period.

Faster Recovery: Patients typically experience a quicker recovery compared to open surgery, with a shorter hospital stay and a faster return to normal activities.

Lower Risk of Infection: The risk of infection is lower compared to open surgical methods because of the smaller incisions and reduced tissue exposure.

Incomplete Removal: While endoscopic removal is effective for many lipomas, it may not be suitable for all cases, especially if the lipoma is large, deeply embedded, or has a dense capsule. In such cases, additional treatments may be required.

Recurrence: There is a risk of lipoma recurrence, particularly if the lipoma cells are not entirely removed during the procedure. The recurrence rate may vary depending on the lipoma's characteristics.

Numbness or Sensation Changes: Some patients may experience temporary numbness or altered sensation around the treated area due to nerve manipulation during the procedure. These sensations typically resolve over time.

Bruising and Swelling: While less severe than in open surgery, endoscopic removal can still cause bruising and swelling at the incision sites. These symptoms usually improve as the body heals.

Instrumental Risks: The use of surgical instruments during endoscopic removal carries a slight risk of damage to nearby structures, although this risk is minimized with the endoscope's visualization.

Scarring: While the scars from endoscopic removal are generally small and less noticeable than those from open surgery, there is still a risk of scarring at the incision sites.

Skill and Experience: The success of endoscopic removal largely depends on the surgeon's skill and experience with the technique. Choosing an experienced surgeon is crucial for achieving optimal results.

Anaesthesia Risks: As with any surgical procedure, there are risks associated with anaesthesia, including allergic reactions or complications. Your anesthesiologist will assess your medical history and determine the appropriate type of anaesthesia for you.

Minimal Access Excision

Small Incisions: Minimal access excision involves making smaller incisions compared to traditional open surgery. This results in smaller scars and reduced tissue trauma.

Precise Removal: The surgeon can visualize the lipoma and surrounding tissues clearly, allowing for precise removal while minimizing damage to healthy tissue.

Reduced Pain and Swelling: Patients typically experience less post-operative pain and swelling compared to open surgery, leading to a more comfortable recovery.

Shorter Recovery Time: Recovery after minimal access excision is often faster than with open surgery. Patients can usually return to their regular activities sooner.

Lower Risk of Infection: Smaller incisions and reduced tissue exposure contribute to a lower infection risk than open surgical methods.

Incomplete Removal: While minimal access excision is effective for many lipomas, it may not be suitable for all cases, especially if the lipoma is very large, deeply embedded, or has a dense capsule. In such instances, additional treatments may be necessary.

Recurrence: There is a risk of lipoma recurrence, particularly if not all lipoma cells are removed during the procedure. Recurrence rates may vary depending on the lipoma's characteristics.

Numbness or Sensation Changes: Some patients may experience temporary numbness or altered sensation around the treated area due to nerve manipulation during the procedure. These sensations generally resolve over time.

Bruising and Swelling: While less severe than in open surgery, minimal access excision can still cause bruising and swelling at the incision sites. These symptoms typically improve as the body heals.

Scarring: Although the scars from minimal access excision are generally smaller and less noticeable than those from open surgery, there is still a risk of scarring at the incision sites.

Instrumental Risks: The use of surgical instruments during minimal access excision carries a slight risk of damage to nearby structures, although this risk is minimized compared to open surgery.

Skill and Experience: The success of minimal access excision depends on the surgeon's skill and experience with the technique. Choosing an experienced surgeon is crucial for achieving optimal results.

Anaesthesia Risks: As with any surgical procedure, there are risks associated with anaesthesia, including allergic reactions or complications. Your anesthetist will assess your medical history and determine the appropriate type of anaesthesia for you.

Tumescent Technique

Minimised Pain and Discomfort: The tumescent solution typically contains a local anaesthetic (such as lidocaine), which numbs the treatment area. This helps reduce pain and discomfort during and after the procedure, potentially eliminating the need for general anaesthesia.

Reduced Bleeding: The solution also contains vasoconstrictors (agents that constrict blood vessels), which help minimise bleeding during the procedure. This can lead to less bruising and a quicker recovery.

Improved Precision: The tumescent technique provides the surgeon with a more stable and controlled environment for removing lipomas. The solution swells the targeted area, making it easier to differentiate the lipoma from surrounding tissues.

Smaller Incisions: Because the tumescent solution helps separate the lipoma from surrounding tissue, smaller incisions can be made for lipoma removal, resulting in smaller scars.

Shorter Recovery Time: Patients often experience a faster recovery compared to traditional liposuction or surgical techniques. Many can return to their normal activities relatively quickly.

Infection: While the risk of infection is lower compared to traditional surgery, there is still a minimal risk associated with any surgical procedure. Proper post-operative care and hygiene are essential to minimise this risk.

Numbness or Sensation Changes: The use of local anaesthetic can result in temporary numbness or altered sensation in the treated area. These sensations typically resolve as the anaesthetic wears off.

Swelling and Bruising: While the tumescent technique reduces the risk of significant bruising and swelling compared to some other methods, some degree of post-operative swelling and bruising is still possible.

Allergic Reactions: Although rare, some individuals may be allergic to components of the tumescent solution. It's essential to discuss any known allergies with your surgeon beforehand.

Asymmetry or Irregularities: There is a slight risk of uneven results or contour irregularities after lipoma removal using the tumescent technique. This can often be addressed with additional treatments if necessary.

Recurrence: Like other lipoma removal methods, there is a risk of recurrence if not all lipoma cells are removed during the procedure. Recurrence rates may vary depending on the lipoma's characteristics.

Skill and Experience: The success of the tumescent technique depends on the surgeon's skill and experience. Choosing an experienced surgeon who specialises in this technique is essential for achieving the best possible outcome.

Radio-frequency Ablation

Minimally Invasive: RFA is a minimally invasive technique that typically requires only a small incision or needle puncture to access the lipoma, resulting in less tissue damage and smaller scars compared to open surgery.

Effective Lipoma Reduction: RFA effectively heats and destroys the fat cells within the lipoma, leading to a reduction in size or complete removal of the lipoma.

Local Anesthesia: The procedure is often performed under local anaesthesia, reducing the risks associated with general anaesthesia.

Quick Recovery: Patients usually experience a shorter recovery time compared to traditional open surgical methods. Many can return to their normal activities within a few days.

Reduced Pain: RFA typically causes less post-operative pain compared to open surgery, and over-the-counter pain medications are often sufficient for managing any discomfort.

Minimal Scarring: The small incision or needle puncture used for RFA results in minimal scarring, which is less noticeable than the scars from open surgery.

Incomplete Removal: RFA may not completely remove all lipoma cells, especially in cases of larger or more extensive lipomas. This can lead to a risk of recurrence, although recurrence rates may vary depending on the specific lipoma.

Nerve or Tissue Damage: There is a slight risk of damaging nearby nerves or tissues during the procedure, although this risk is minimized with the guidance of imaging techniques such as ultrasound.

Infection: Although the risk of infection is relatively low with RFA, there is still a small possibility of infection at the treatment site. Proper post-operative care and hygiene are essential to reduce this risk.

Skin Changes: Some patients may experience temporary changes in skin colour or texture around the treated area. These changes typically resolve over time.

Numbness or Sensation Changes: RFA can occasionally lead to temporary numbness or altered sensation in the treated area due to nerve involvement. These sensations generally resolve as the body heals.

Allergic Reactions: Although rare, some individuals may experience allergic reactions to materials used during the procedure. It's important to discuss any known allergies with your healthcare provider.

Skin Burns: There is a risk of skin burns if the RFA probe is not properly positioned or if the procedure is not closely monitored.

Cost: Depending on the healthcare facility and insurance coverage, RFA may be more expensive than some other minimally invasive techniques.

Laser Lipolysis

Minimally Invasive: Laser lipolysis is a minimally invasive technique that typically requires only small incisions, resulting in less tissue damage and smaller scars compared to open surgery.

Effective Lipoma Reduction: The laser energy effectively liquefies the fat cells within the lipoma, allowing for their removal. This can lead to a reduction in size or complete removal of the lipoma.

Local Anesthesia: The procedure is often performed under local anaesthesia, reducing the risks associated with general anaesthesia.

Precision: Laser lipolysis provides the surgeon with a high degree of precision, allowing for targeted treatment of the lipoma while minimizing damage to surrounding tissues.

Quick Recovery: Patients usually experience a shorter recovery time compared to traditional open surgical methods. Many can return to their normal activities within a few days.

Reduced Pain: Laser lipolysis typically causes less post-operative pain compared to open surgery, and over-the-counter pain medications are often sufficient for managing any discomfort.

Minimal Scarring: The small incisions used for laser lipolysis result in minimal scarring, which is less noticeable than the scars from open surgery.

Effectiveness: Cryolipolysis is primarily designed for cosmetic fat reduction and may not be as effective at completely eliminating lipomas as other treatment methods. Lipomas are composed of different types of fat cells, and the response to freezing temperatures may vary.

Incomplete Removal: Cryolipolysis may not fully remove all lipoma cells, potentially leading to a risk of recurrence. The size and depth of the lipoma can affect the success of the treatment.

Temporary Side Effects: Patients may experience temporary side effects, including numbness, redness, bruising, and swelling in the treated area. These typically resolve over time.

Skin Irregularities: Cryolipolysis can sometimes result in uneven skin texture or contour irregularities in the treated area. This is generally less common with lipoma treatment than with cosmetic fat reduction procedures but can still occur.

Multiple Sessions: Multiple cryolipolysis sessions may be required to achieve the desired lipoma reduction, which can increase the overall cost and time commitment.

Patient Selection: Not all lipomas may be suitable for cryolipolysis treatment, especially if they are particularly large or located in challenging areas.

Cost: The cost of cryolipolysis can add up, especially if multiple sessions are needed. It's essential to consider this when evaluating treatment options.

Skill and Experience: The success of cryolipolysis for lipoma treatment can vary depending on the experience and expertise of the provider performing the procedure.

Cryolipolysis

Non-Invasive: Cryolipolysis is a non-invasive technique, meaning it does not require incisions, needles, or surgery. This can be advantageous for those who wish to avoid surgical procedures.

Minimal Discomfort: Patients typically experience minimal discomfort during the procedure, as the cold temperature numbs the treatment area. There is often no need for anaesthesia or pain medication.

No Scarring: Because there are no incisions involved, there is no scarring associated with cryolipolysis.

Quick Recovery: Most patients can return to their normal activities immediately after the procedure, as there is no downtime required.

Reduced Risk of Infection: Cryolipolysis carries a lower risk of infection compared to invasive surgical techniques.

Incomplete Removal: Laser lipolysis may not completely remove all lipoma cells, especially in cases of larger or more extensive lipomas. This can lead to a risk of recurrence, although recurrence rates may vary depending on the specific lipoma.

Nerve or Tissue Damage: There is a slight risk of damaging nearby nerves or tissues during the procedure, although this risk is minimized with the use of laser technology and the surgeon's expertise.

Infection: Although the risk of infection is relatively low with laser lipolysis, there is still a small possibility of infection at the treatment site. Proper post-operative care and hygiene are essential to reduce this risk.

Skin Burns: There is a risk of skin burns if the laser energy is not properly controlled or if the procedure is not closely monitored.

Skin Changes: Some patients may experience temporary changes in skin color or texture around the treated area. These changes typically resolve over time.

Numbness or Sensation Changes: Laser lipolysis can occasionally lead to temporary numbness or altered sensation in the treated area due to nerve involvement. These sensations generally resolve as the body heals.

Allergic Reactions: Although rare, some individuals may experience allergic reactions to materials used during the procedure. It's important to discuss any known allergies with your healthcare provider.

Cost: Depending on the healthcare facility and insurance coverage, laser lipolysis may be more expensive than some other minimally invasive techniques.

In closing, we’ve journeyed through the world of lipomas, understanding their impact on your life and the array of treatment options available. Knowledge is power, and armed with insights into the pros and cons of each method, you’re now better equipped to make a decision that suits your needs.


At Kliniken, conveniently located near Harrogate, North Yorkshire, we specialise in the art of treating lipomas. Our dedicated team, led by a highly experienced plastic surgeon, is committed to providing you with the highest level of care and expertise. Your well-being is our priority, and we’re here to guide you through the journey to renewed confidence and comfort.


If you’re ready to take the next step or have any questions, don’t hesitate to get in touch with us. You can reach us by text, phone call, or email, and our friendly staff will be delighted to assist you on your path to a lipoma-free life. Your journey to a better quality of life begins with us.

Contact us

Email – info@kliniken.co.uk

Phone – 01423 26388

Mobile – 07765665984

Leave a comment